<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BPMN Method and Style &#8211; Now Available</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.brsilver.com/wordpress/2009/06/11/bpmn-method-and-style-now-available/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.brsilver.com/wordpress/2009/06/11/bpmn-method-and-style-now-available/</link>
	<description>Bruce Silver's blog on business process management</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 10:22:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sam Paakki</title>
		<link>http://www.brsilver.com/wordpress/2009/06/11/bpmn-method-and-style-now-available/comment-page-1/#comment-7049</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Paakki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 00:37:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brsilver.com/wordpress/?p=561#comment-7049</guid>
		<description>Hi Bruce,

Thank you providing this excellent resource! The dictionary/BPMN 2.0 analogy is very appropriate. :) I also loved the education/training one. :)

I&#039;m totally on board with the 3 levels, in fact I see another level at about 0.5, but I won&#039;t go into that now. I&#039;m interested to hear your views on semantic quality and its relationship to each of your top two levels (assuming the execution semantics of level 3 are 100% accurate).

Is it okay at level 1 to model something that is not of high semantic quality, given the reduced palette and possibly lower training/education level of the modeller.  Is this the same for level 2?  I&#039;m considering things like multiple-instance pools (chp13).

Also, does your book cover parallel multiple events anywhere?  Seems to be very level 3 to me.

Kind regards
Sam</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Bruce,</p>
<p>Thank you providing this excellent resource! The dictionary/BPMN 2.0 analogy is very appropriate. <img src='http://www.brsilver.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  I also loved the education/training one. <img src='http://www.brsilver.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I&#8217;m totally on board with the 3 levels, in fact I see another level at about 0.5, but I won&#8217;t go into that now. I&#8217;m interested to hear your views on semantic quality and its relationship to each of your top two levels (assuming the execution semantics of level 3 are 100% accurate).</p>
<p>Is it okay at level 1 to model something that is not of high semantic quality, given the reduced palette and possibly lower training/education level of the modeller.  Is this the same for level 2?  I&#8217;m considering things like multiple-instance pools (chp13).</p>
<p>Also, does your book cover parallel multiple events anywhere?  Seems to be very level 3 to me.</p>
<p>Kind regards<br />
Sam</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ppiot</title>
		<link>http://www.brsilver.com/wordpress/2009/06/11/bpmn-method-and-style-now-available/comment-page-1/#comment-7031</link>
		<dc:creator>ppiot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 17:48:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brsilver.com/wordpress/?p=561#comment-7031</guid>
		<description>Hello Bruce,
I&#039;ve ordered your book and look forward to reading it.

As someone who is new to BPM and BPMN, I&#039;m wondering if you can tell me if using BPMN to model process control flows can or is likely to replace Lean&#039;s Value Stream Mapping as a way to optimize business processes?

Our organization has adopted SAP&#039;s ERP software and their ARIS modelling tool. They&#039;ve begun to implement SAP in one region of the global enterprise and within a few years we&#039;ll be adopting it too. Can you tell me if I&#039;d be wasting my time by starting to map our processes using Lean&#039;s VSM tools? Does it make more sense for me to learn BPMN and start mapping using ARIS?

I guess the real question is: Is there a place for VSM if BPMN is adopted companywide?

Regards,
Paul</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Bruce,<br />
I&#8217;ve ordered your book and look forward to reading it.</p>
<p>As someone who is new to BPM and BPMN, I&#8217;m wondering if you can tell me if using BPMN to model process control flows can or is likely to replace Lean&#8217;s Value Stream Mapping as a way to optimize business processes?</p>
<p>Our organization has adopted SAP&#8217;s ERP software and their ARIS modelling tool. They&#8217;ve begun to implement SAP in one region of the global enterprise and within a few years we&#8217;ll be adopting it too. Can you tell me if I&#8217;d be wasting my time by starting to map our processes using Lean&#8217;s VSM tools? Does it make more sense for me to learn BPMN and start mapping using ARIS?</p>
<p>I guess the real question is: Is there a place for VSM if BPMN is adopted companywide?</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Paul</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nickbroom</title>
		<link>http://www.brsilver.com/wordpress/2009/06/11/bpmn-method-and-style-now-available/comment-page-1/#comment-7021</link>
		<dc:creator>nickbroom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 16:11:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brsilver.com/wordpress/?p=561#comment-7021</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s great Bruce - thanks for such a speedy reply; I look forward to reading your book!

Thanks

Nick</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s great Bruce &#8211; thanks for such a speedy reply; I look forward to reading your book!</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
<p>Nick</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bruce</title>
		<link>http://www.brsilver.com/wordpress/2009/06/11/bpmn-method-and-style-now-available/comment-page-1/#comment-7020</link>
		<dc:creator>bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 14:51:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brsilver.com/wordpress/?p=561#comment-7020</guid>
		<description>Nick,
Usually changes in the Finalization Task Force (FTF) phase are minor, bugs reported by implementers (tool vendors).  The book focuses on the elements visible in the diagram, whereas I would expect any changes to be in the invisible executable details underneath, maybe minor tweaks to the schema.  I would be shocked if the key new diagram elements discussed in the book - non-interrupting events, event subprocesses, and Escalation event - were eliminated or changed significantly.
--Bruce</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick,<br />
Usually changes in the Finalization Task Force (FTF) phase are minor, bugs reported by implementers (tool vendors).  The book focuses on the elements visible in the diagram, whereas I would expect any changes to be in the invisible executable details underneath, maybe minor tweaks to the schema.  I would be shocked if the key new diagram elements discussed in the book &#8211; non-interrupting events, event subprocesses, and Escalation event &#8211; were eliminated or changed significantly.<br />
&#8211;Bruce</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nickbroom</title>
		<link>http://www.brsilver.com/wordpress/2009/06/11/bpmn-method-and-style-now-available/comment-page-1/#comment-7019</link>
		<dc:creator>nickbroom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 08:34:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brsilver.com/wordpress/?p=561#comment-7019</guid>
		<description>Hi Bruce,

The reviews of this book certainly look awesome and I enjoy the articles on this site, my only query before I purchase it is: given that BPMN 2.0 is yet to be signed off, what is the likelihood of change to the standards discussed in your book based on that sign-off?

Thanks

Nick</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Bruce,</p>
<p>The reviews of this book certainly look awesome and I enjoy the articles on this site, my only query before I purchase it is: given that BPMN 2.0 is yet to be signed off, what is the likelihood of change to the standards discussed in your book based on that sign-off?</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
<p>Nick</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AlWilkinson</title>
		<link>http://www.brsilver.com/wordpress/2009/06/11/bpmn-method-and-style-now-available/comment-page-1/#comment-7015</link>
		<dc:creator>AlWilkinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 22:36:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brsilver.com/wordpress/?p=561#comment-7015</guid>
		<description>Congratulations, Bruce! 
I expect this work will help elevate the level of discourse, and improve a lot of the work being done.
(My copy is on its way.)
Looking forward, aw</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations, Bruce!<br />
I expect this work will help elevate the level of discourse, and improve a lot of the work being done.<br />
(My copy is on its way.)<br />
Looking forward, aw</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sca</title>
		<link>http://www.brsilver.com/wordpress/2009/06/11/bpmn-method-and-style-now-available/comment-page-1/#comment-7014</link>
		<dc:creator>sca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 09:50:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brsilver.com/wordpress/?p=561#comment-7014</guid>
		<description>Really looking forward to getting my hands on this book, Bruce!
Regards,
Steinar Carlsen</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really looking forward to getting my hands on this book, Bruce!<br />
Regards,<br />
Steinar Carlsen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
