<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OMG!! It&#8217;s About Process Execution?  Who Knew??</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.brsilver.com/wordpress/2009/03/31/omg-its-about-process-execution-who-knew/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.brsilver.com/wordpress/2009/03/31/omg-its-about-process-execution-who-knew/</link>
	<description>Bruce Silver's blog on business process management</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 10:22:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: identigral</title>
		<link>http://www.brsilver.com/wordpress/2009/03/31/omg-its-about-process-execution-who-knew/comment-page-1/#comment-6983</link>
		<dc:creator>identigral</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 21:33:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brsilver.com/wordpress/?p=507#comment-6983</guid>
		<description>Bruce,

I am not arguing for or against, I think the discussion is worth a post rather than being buried in comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bruce,</p>
<p>I am not arguing for or against, I think the discussion is worth a post rather than being buried in comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bruce</title>
		<link>http://www.brsilver.com/wordpress/2009/03/31/omg-its-about-process-execution-who-knew/comment-page-1/#comment-6982</link>
		<dc:creator>bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 20:11:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brsilver.com/wordpress/?p=507#comment-6982</guid>
		<description>Just to be perfectly clear... I am not trying to speak for implementors re positioning BPMN vs BPEL.  That is a marketing question, not a technical one.  I am just comparing the specs.  The data definition and mapping section is nearly the same.  The human task model is aligned with BPEL4People.  What part of BPEL is NOT in BPMN 2.0?  I don&#039;t see anything...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to be perfectly clear&#8230; I am not trying to speak for implementors re positioning BPMN vs BPEL.  That is a marketing question, not a technical one.  I am just comparing the specs.  The data definition and mapping section is nearly the same.  The human task model is aligned with BPEL4People.  What part of BPEL is NOT in BPMN 2.0?  I don&#8217;t see anything&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: identigral</title>
		<link>http://www.brsilver.com/wordpress/2009/03/31/omg-its-about-process-execution-who-knew/comment-page-1/#comment-6981</link>
		<dc:creator>identigral</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 19:44:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brsilver.com/wordpress/?p=507#comment-6981</guid>
		<description>Bruce,

Thanks for the update. I found your comment to Kirill about implementors positioning BPMN as a replacement of BPEL very interesting, perhaps you could clarify in another post. My thoughts (on a not completely related subject but still related :) are &lt;a href=&quot;www.identigral.com/blog/2009/04/10/beeping-in-minnesota&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bruce,</p>
<p>Thanks for the update. I found your comment to Kirill about implementors positioning BPMN as a replacement of BPEL very interesting, perhaps you could clarify in another post. My thoughts (on a not completely related subject but still related <img src='http://www.brsilver.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  are <a href="www.identigral.com/blog/2009/04/10/beeping-in-minnesota" rel="nofollow">here</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kirill_Lis</title>
		<link>http://www.brsilver.com/wordpress/2009/03/31/omg-its-about-process-execution-who-knew/comment-page-1/#comment-6980</link>
		<dc:creator>Kirill_Lis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 09:33:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brsilver.com/wordpress/?p=507#comment-6980</guid>
		<description>&quot;BPMN 2.0 is a couple weeks away from its equivalent of “code freeze”&quot;

Can you say now whether it really able to replace BPEL as an execution standard or not?

Kirill</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;BPMN 2.0 is a couple weeks away from its equivalent of “code freeze”&#8221;</p>
<p>Can you say now whether it really able to replace BPEL as an execution standard or not?</p>
<p>Kirill</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bruce</title>
		<link>http://www.brsilver.com/wordpress/2009/03/31/omg-its-about-process-execution-who-knew/comment-page-1/#comment-6979</link>
		<dc:creator>bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 18:59:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brsilver.com/wordpress/?p=507#comment-6979</guid>
		<description>Kirill,
These questions must be answered by the implementors, e.g. Oracle, IBM, etc.  Whether they position BPMN 2.0 as a replacement of BPEL or a front end to BPEL is up to them.
--Bruce</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kirill,<br />
These questions must be answered by the implementors, e.g. Oracle, IBM, etc.  Whether they position BPMN 2.0 as a replacement of BPEL or a front end to BPEL is up to them.<br />
&#8211;Bruce</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kirill_Lis</title>
		<link>http://www.brsilver.com/wordpress/2009/03/31/omg-its-about-process-execution-who-knew/comment-page-1/#comment-6978</link>
		<dc:creator>Kirill_Lis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 12:08:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brsilver.com/wordpress/?p=507#comment-6978</guid>
		<description>Bruce, I can not understand several points about new standard.
Please, answer several questions

How this new specification will impact BPMN-BPEL alliance?
Are not BPMN 2.0 and BPEL intersect now?
Is there any need in BPEL for BPMN 2.0 adopters, if BPMN 2.0 artifacts will include implementation details?
Will BPMN 2.0 models be processed by process engines directly?

Thank you in advance.

Kirill Lis</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bruce, I can not understand several points about new standard.<br />
Please, answer several questions</p>
<p>How this new specification will impact BPMN-BPEL alliance?<br />
Are not BPMN 2.0 and BPEL intersect now?<br />
Is there any need in BPEL for BPMN 2.0 adopters, if BPMN 2.0 artifacts will include implementation details?<br />
Will BPMN 2.0 models be processed by process engines directly?</p>
<p>Thank you in advance.</p>
<p>Kirill Lis</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hbraun</title>
		<link>http://www.brsilver.com/wordpress/2009/03/31/omg-its-about-process-execution-who-knew/comment-page-1/#comment-6977</link>
		<dc:creator>hbraun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 07:23:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brsilver.com/wordpress/?p=507#comment-6977</guid>
		<description>&lt;cite&gt;At least the diagrams will be schema-valid!&lt;/cite&gt;

Right, a large step into the right direction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><cite>At least the diagrams will be schema-valid!</cite></p>
<p>Right, a large step into the right direction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
