<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Step Up Your Modeling Game With Subprocesses</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.brsilver.com/wordpress/2007/11/28/step-up-your-modeling-game-with-subprocesses/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.brsilver.com/wordpress/2007/11/28/step-up-your-modeling-game-with-subprocesses/</link>
	<description>Bruce Silver's blog on business process management</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 22:46:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: kewbss</title>
		<link>http://www.brsilver.com/wordpress/2007/11/28/step-up-your-modeling-game-with-subprocesses/#comment-2947</link>
		<dc:creator>kewbss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 21:43:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brsilver.com/wordpress/2007/11/28/step-up-your-modeling-game-with-subprocesses/#comment-2947</guid>
		<description>Bruce,

Your observation that "In its collapsed representation, a subprocess describes the inputs and outputs of the service ..." is not entirely correct given that one thing a BPMN diagram doesn't show is data-flows.

Data (ie inputs and outputs) available to a sub-process might be inferred by the observer and in fact might be defined in sub-process/task attributes, but they are not explicit in a BPMN diagram.

Adding annotations to flow lines is one way of providing this information on a model, but that is somewhat redundant if data definitions are also recorded in process attributes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bruce,</p>
<p>Your observation that &#8220;In its collapsed representation, a subprocess describes the inputs and outputs of the service &#8230;&#8221; is not entirely correct given that one thing a BPMN diagram doesn&#8217;t show is data-flows.</p>
<p>Data (ie inputs and outputs) available to a sub-process might be inferred by the observer and in fact might be defined in sub-process/task attributes, but they are not explicit in a BPMN diagram.</p>
<p>Adding annotations to flow lines is one way of providing this information on a model, but that is somewhat redundant if data definitions are also recorded in process attributes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
