<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BPMN Gaining Traction in BPA Tools</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.brsilver.com/wordpress/2007/05/07/bpmn-gaining-traction-in-bpa-tools/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.brsilver.com/wordpress/2007/05/07/bpmn-gaining-traction-in-bpa-tools/</link>
	<description>Bruce Silver's blog on business process management</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 13:54:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: marlon_dumas</title>
		<link>http://www.brsilver.com/wordpress/2007/05/07/bpmn-gaining-traction-in-bpa-tools/#comment-1970</link>
		<dc:creator>marlon_dumas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 05:59:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brsilver.com/wordpress/2007/05/07/bpmn-gaining-traction-in-bpa-tools/#comment-1970</guid>
		<description>BPMN is indeed gaining traction among tool vendors . But is BPMN "good enough" and for which purposes? Which classes of BPMN users find it more useful or usable? Do business analysts find BPMN more useful than IT solution architects do? Why do people find BPMN to be an "intuitive" notation? Do early adopters of BPMN intend to continue using it into the future? The following survey, organised by the BPM Research Group at Queensland University of Technology, is gathering data to address many of these questions (and the aggregated results will be made public). Please contribute, the more the merrier: http://www.bpm.fit.qut.edu.au/projects/acceptance/survey/BPMN/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BPMN is indeed gaining traction among tool vendors . But is BPMN &#8220;good enough&#8221; and for which purposes? Which classes of BPMN users find it more useful or usable? Do business analysts find BPMN more useful than IT solution architects do? Why do people find BPMN to be an &#8220;intuitive&#8221; notation? Do early adopters of BPMN intend to continue using it into the future? The following survey, organised by the BPM Research Group at Queensland University of Technology, is gathering data to address many of these questions (and the aggregated results will be made public). Please contribute, the more the merrier: <a href="http://www.bpm.fit.qut.edu.au/projects/acceptance/survey/BPMN/" rel="nofollow">http://www.bpm.fit.qut.edu.au/projects/acceptance/survey/BPMN/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paulvanerk</title>
		<link>http://www.brsilver.com/wordpress/2007/05/07/bpmn-gaining-traction-in-bpa-tools/#comment-1747</link>
		<dc:creator>paulvanerk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 20:37:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brsilver.com/wordpress/2007/05/07/bpmn-gaining-traction-in-bpa-tools/#comment-1747</guid>
		<description>Bruce, I know my question is a little bit off topic, however I am very interested in your opinion.

A few weeks ago I was writing a post about the difference between a workflow management system and a BPMS and I couldn't really figure it out.

Below you can find the results of my research:

Characteristics Workflow MAnagement System:
Focusses on processing of digital business/office documents
Manual processes or decision making processes are not considered
Emphasises use of information technology

Characteristics BPMS:
Includes manual activities/processes
Business processes can be related to every kind of resource

However I think the line between BPMS and workflow management system is vanishing, because most workflow systems nowadays tend to be a BPMS. What is your opinion about this?

With regards,

Paul van Erk

http://sourcelinq.blogspot.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bruce, I know my question is a little bit off topic, however I am very interested in your opinion.</p>
<p>A few weeks ago I was writing a post about the difference between a workflow management system and a BPMS and I couldn&#8217;t really figure it out.</p>
<p>Below you can find the results of my research:</p>
<p>Characteristics Workflow MAnagement System:<br />
Focusses on processing of digital business/office documents<br />
Manual processes or decision making processes are not considered<br />
Emphasises use of information technology</p>
<p>Characteristics BPMS:<br />
Includes manual activities/processes<br />
Business processes can be related to every kind of resource</p>
<p>However I think the line between BPMS and workflow management system is vanishing, because most workflow systems nowadays tend to be a BPMS. What is your opinion about this?</p>
<p>With regards,</p>
<p>Paul van Erk</p>
<p><a href="http://sourcelinq.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://sourcelinq.blogspot.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kewbss</title>
		<link>http://www.brsilver.com/wordpress/2007/05/07/bpmn-gaining-traction-in-bpa-tools/#comment-1693</link>
		<dc:creator>kewbss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 23:03:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brsilver.com/wordpress/2007/05/07/bpmn-gaining-traction-in-bpa-tools/#comment-1693</guid>
		<description>Bruce,

You probably also spotted the announcement a few days ago by Handysoft that their BizFlow BPM suite will soon have BPMN and BPEL support - see http://www.handysoft.com/news/viewPressRelease.asp?id=110

Warwick</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bruce,</p>
<p>You probably also spotted the announcement a few days ago by Handysoft that their BizFlow BPM suite will soon have BPMN and BPEL support - see <a href="http://www.handysoft.com/news/viewPressRelease.asp?id=110" rel="nofollow">http://www.handysoft.com/news/viewPressRelease.asp?id=110</a></p>
<p>Warwick</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Developments with BPMS and BPMN that you should be aware of &#171; BPM knowledge that you can use</title>
		<link>http://www.brsilver.com/wordpress/2007/05/07/bpmn-gaining-traction-in-bpa-tools/#comment-1690</link>
		<dc:creator>Developments with BPMS and BPMN that you should be aware of &#171; BPM knowledge that you can use</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 22:56:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brsilver.com/wordpress/2007/05/07/bpmn-gaining-traction-in-bpa-tools/#comment-1690</guid>
		<description>[...] Developments with BPMS and BPMN that you should be aware&#160;of  Recent commentary from two &#8220;must read&#8221; analysts: Paul Harmon and Bruce Silver.  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Developments with BPMS and BPMN that you should be aware&nbsp;of  Recent commentary from two &#8220;must read&#8221; analysts: Paul Harmon and Bruce Silver.  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2007-05-08 &#171; steinarcarlsen</title>
		<link>http://www.brsilver.com/wordpress/2007/05/07/bpmn-gaining-traction-in-bpa-tools/#comment-1688</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2007-05-08 &#171; steinarcarlsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 21:18:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brsilver.com/wordpress/2007/05/07/bpmn-gaining-traction-in-bpa-tools/#comment-1688</guid>
		<description>[...] BPMN Gaining Traction in BPA Tools (tags: bpm bpmn cx aris) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] BPMN Gaining Traction in BPA Tools (tags: bpm bpmn cx aris) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
