http://www.brsilver.com/wordpress/2007/03/26/bpdm-passes-important-hurdle/ Bruce Silver's blog on business process management Fri, 05 Sep 2008 13:53:41 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 http://www.brsilver.com/wordpress/2007/03/26/bpdm-passes-important-hurdle/#comment-1977 Off Topic :: links for 2007-06-23 Sat, 23 Jun 2007 23:26:13 +0000 http://www.brsilver.com/wordpress/2007/03/26/bpdm-passes-important-hurdle/#comment-1977 [...] BPMS Watch » BPDM Passes Important Hurdles The BPDM standard is moving ahead: this is a report from March on the status. I’m expecting to see a lot more about this at the BPM Think Tank next month. (tags: bpdm) [...] [...] BPMS Watch » BPDM Passes Important Hurdles The BPDM standard is moving ahead: this is a report from March on the status. I’m expecting to see a lot more about this at the BPM Think Tank next month. (tags: bpdm) [...]

]]> http://www.brsilver.com/wordpress/2007/03/26/bpdm-passes-important-hurdle/#comment-719 links for 2007-03-27 « steinarcarlsen Tue, 27 Mar 2007 21:35:28 +0000 http://www.brsilver.com/wordpress/2007/03/26/bpdm-passes-important-hurdle/#comment-719 [...] BPDM Passes Important Hurdles (tags: bpmn bpdm bpm cx) [...] [...] BPDM Passes Important Hurdles (tags: bpmn bpdm bpm cx) [...]

]]> http://www.brsilver.com/wordpress/2007/03/26/bpdm-passes-important-hurdle/#comment-704 marlon_dumas Tue, 27 Mar 2007 00:25:27 +0000 http://www.brsilver.com/wordpress/2007/03/26/bpdm-passes-important-hurdle/#comment-704 "The first step was to define the notation, and now we’ve defined the metamodel." Funny: they first define a notation without a proper syntax or semantics, then they go on to define a metamodel to properly capture its syntax, but the problem is that this meta-model does not match the notation... But patience! They'll now start having meetings about how to revise the notation to match the meta-model... Ah! And this weekend we'll fix the XMI... And we'll do a few twists here and there and we'll get EMF to generate a proper XSD. But this XSD won't be normative, so vendors will have the choice of using a different one? Bruce: I think we're in for another year of waiting for the next version of BPMN! “The first step was to define the notation, and now we’ve defined the metamodel.”
Funny: they first define a notation without a proper syntax or semantics, then they go on to define a metamodel to properly capture its syntax, but the problem is that this meta-model does not match the notation… But patience! They’ll now start having meetings about how to revise the notation to match the meta-model…
Ah! And this weekend we’ll fix the XMI… And we’ll do a few twists here and there and we’ll get EMF to generate a proper XSD. But this XSD won’t be normative, so vendors will have the choice of using a different one?
Bruce: I think we’re in for another year of waiting for the next version of BPMN!

]]>