<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More on Model Autogeneration</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.brsilver.com/wordpress/2007/02/10/more-on-model-autogeneration/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.brsilver.com/wordpress/2007/02/10/more-on-model-autogeneration/</link>
	<description>Bruce Silver's blog on business process management</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 22:59:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: frenchbrian</title>
		<link>http://www.brsilver.com/wordpress/2007/02/10/more-on-model-autogeneration/#comment-550</link>
		<dc:creator>frenchbrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 21:24:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brsilver.com/wordpress/2007/02/10/more-on-model-autogeneration/#comment-550</guid>
		<description>I agree IDS-Scheer's PPM is a powerful tool, however one of the issues I've heard about it is the requirement for professional services to be involved in every installation.  Can anyone confirm or refute this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree IDS-Scheer&#8217;s PPM is a powerful tool, however one of the issues I&#8217;ve heard about it is the requirement for professional services to be involved in every installation.  Can anyone confirm or refute this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: carlosk2</title>
		<link>http://www.brsilver.com/wordpress/2007/02/10/more-on-model-autogeneration/#comment-475</link>
		<dc:creator>carlosk2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 19:04:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brsilver.com/wordpress/2007/02/10/more-on-model-autogeneration/#comment-475</guid>
		<description>Bruce, 

First of all, my congratulations for his defense of BPMN (BPMN is great).
Be careful on IDS/PPM. There are many hidden traps. We tested exastivamente the PPM recently. What the PPM does in the recomposition of the process is not special feature at all is a limitation because of not managing to recover the original process. The PPM recomposes the process simply putting the activities side by side, according to the sequencia that they were logged. PPM only can recognize the sequencia is not able to reconstitute a real process flow not even of recompose the complex gateway or manuals activities or launched compensations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bruce, </p>
<p>First of all, my congratulations for his defense of BPMN (BPMN is great).<br />
Be careful on IDS/PPM. There are many hidden traps. We tested exastivamente the PPM recently. What the PPM does in the recomposition of the process is not special feature at all is a limitation because of not managing to recover the original process. The PPM recomposes the process simply putting the activities side by side, according to the sequencia that they were logged. PPM only can recognize the sequencia is not able to reconstitute a real process flow not even of recompose the complex gateway or manuals activities or launched compensations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wvdaalst</title>
		<link>http://www.brsilver.com/wordpress/2007/02/10/more-on-model-autogeneration/#comment-466</link>
		<dc:creator>wvdaalst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 07:41:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brsilver.com/wordpress/2007/02/10/more-on-model-autogeneration/#comment-466</guid>
		<description>ARIS PPM is one of the first BI tools that is process aware. (Most BI tools look at an aggregated level without assuming/discovering an explicit process model.) However, PPM is indeed not doing any magic. The user either needs to model the process beforehand or a dedicated connector is used (e.g., for SAP or Staffware) that is specific for a particular process. This implies that PPM can only be used if the process is already known beforehand and it cannot be used to “discover” processes.

However, it is possible to do process discovery using open source tools such as ProM (prom.sourceforge.net). ProM is a process mining framework offering dozens of process discovery tools. The discovered models can be generated based on event logs without any a-priori modeling and uploaded into ARIS and many other tools. Moreover, ProM also allows for conformance checking. See www.processmining.org for more information about process mining.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ARIS PPM is one of the first BI tools that is process aware. (Most BI tools look at an aggregated level without assuming/discovering an explicit process model.) However, PPM is indeed not doing any magic. The user either needs to model the process beforehand or a dedicated connector is used (e.g., for SAP or Staffware) that is specific for a particular process. This implies that PPM can only be used if the process is already known beforehand and it cannot be used to “discover” processes.</p>
<p>However, it is possible to do process discovery using open source tools such as ProM (prom.sourceforge.net). ProM is a process mining framework offering dozens of process discovery tools. The discovered models can be generated based on event logs without any a-priori modeling and uploaded into ARIS and many other tools. Moreover, ProM also allows for conformance checking. See <a href="http://www.processmining.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.processmining.org</a> for more information about process mining.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bruce</title>
		<link>http://www.brsilver.com/wordpress/2007/02/10/more-on-model-autogeneration/#comment-465</link>
		<dc:creator>bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2007 22:11:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brsilver.com/wordpress/2007/02/10/more-on-model-autogeneration/#comment-465</guid>
		<description>You're saying Czech companies fear it because it works too well?  You should contact IDS; this testimonial would make great advertising copy in the US!  Somehow I doubt that's it...
--Bruce</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re saying Czech companies fear it because it works too well?  You should contact IDS; this testimonial would make great advertising copy in the US!  Somehow I doubt that&#8217;s it&#8230;<br />
&#8211;Bruce</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VaclavSynacek</title>
		<link>http://www.brsilver.com/wordpress/2007/02/10/more-on-model-autogeneration/#comment-464</link>
		<dc:creator>VaclavSynacek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2007 20:42:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brsilver.com/wordpress/2007/02/10/more-on-model-autogeneration/#comment-464</guid>
		<description>Yes, PPM is great (even without the magic). But why after 3 years the customers are just beginning to try it out? After the presentation of PPM at my university one year ago, someone asked this question. The IDS people didn't say it loud, but I got the impression that here in Czech Republic (and I know this can be &lt;em&gt;very&lt;/em&gt; different elsewhere) some managers fear PPM because it could make their corporations more transparent than they would ever like them to be. Or at least that is how I interpreted the much more diplomatic reply.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, PPM is great (even without the magic). But why after 3 years the customers are just beginning to try it out? After the presentation of PPM at my university one year ago, someone asked this question. The IDS people didn&#8217;t say it loud, but I got the impression that here in Czech Republic (and I know this can be <em>very</em> different elsewhere) some managers fear PPM because it could make their corporations more transparent than they would ever like them to be. Or at least that is how I interpreted the much more diplomatic reply.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
