<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: webMethods Tops Forrester Wave</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.brsilver.com/wordpress/2006/12/22/webmethods-tops-forrester-wave/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.brsilver.com/wordpress/2006/12/22/webmethods-tops-forrester-wave/</link>
	<description>Bruce Silver's blog on business process management</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 16:49:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: bruce</title>
		<link>http://www.brsilver.com/wordpress/2006/12/22/webmethods-tops-forrester-wave/comment-page-1/#comment-424</link>
		<dc:creator>bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 20:32:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brsilver.com/wordpress/2006/12/22/webmethods-tops-forrester-wave/#comment-424</guid>
		<description>Paul, 
Sorry for the tardy response. webMethods is actively working on simulation, and I expect they will be announcing something soon.  Also, Appian is first up for the 2007 reports.  We kick off on Monday.
--Bruce</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul,<br />
Sorry for the tardy response. webMethods is actively working on simulation, and I expect they will be announcing something soon.  Also, Appian is first up for the 2007 reports.  We kick off on Monday.<br />
&#8211;Bruce</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paul.fisher</title>
		<link>http://www.brsilver.com/wordpress/2006/12/22/webmethods-tops-forrester-wave/comment-page-1/#comment-376</link>
		<dc:creator>paul.fisher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 15:38:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brsilver.com/wordpress/2006/12/22/webmethods-tops-forrester-wave/#comment-376</guid>
		<description>Just read Forrester's write-up on webMethods.  Sounds like a strong product, but thought this comment - "the vendor lacks a full-fledged business-oriented simulation solution" - was a bit vague, and they seemed to use that to limit the target customer base.  Interesting comment also in the context of your recent discussions on simulation.

Hope you are considering adding Appian to your BPMS Report series.  Certainly not in quite the same category as webMethods, but they did well in the previous BPM Forrester Wave and Gartner Magic Quadrant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just read Forrester&#8217;s write-up on webMethods.  Sounds like a strong product, but thought this comment - &#8220;the vendor lacks a full-fledged business-oriented simulation solution&#8221; - was a bit vague, and they seemed to use that to limit the target customer base.  Interesting comment also in the context of your recent discussions on simulation.</p>
<p>Hope you are considering adding Appian to your BPMS Report series.  Certainly not in quite the same category as webMethods, but they did well in the previous BPM Forrester Wave and Gartner Magic Quadrant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
