<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gartner BPMS Quadrant Released</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.brsilver.com/wordpress/2006/06/29/gartner-bpms-quadrant-released/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.brsilver.com/wordpress/2006/06/29/gartner-bpms-quadrant-released/</link>
	<description>Bruce Silver's blog on business process management</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 16:43:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: bruce</title>
		<link>http://www.brsilver.com/wordpress/2006/06/29/gartner-bpms-quadrant-released/comment-page-1/#comment-277</link>
		<dc:creator>bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 00:35:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brsilver.com/wordpress/2006/06/29/gartner-bpms-quadrant-released/#comment-277</guid>
		<description>Khookguy,
Until very recently Oracle has not positioned its BPEL Process Manager as a BPM suite, but more of an orchestration tool within its SOA suite.  In other words, they did not even call themselves BPM.  But now with the ARIS deal that is changing.  As far as my BPMS Reports on bpminstitute.org are concerned, the ground rules are 1)vendor is a sponsor of BPM Institute, and 2)vendor agrees to be reviewed and coorperates in the process.  I'm hoping to have them in for 2007 and I think you will see them showing up in the Gartner/Forrester reviews then too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Khookguy,<br />
Until very recently Oracle has not positioned its BPEL Process Manager as a BPM suite, but more of an orchestration tool within its SOA suite.  In other words, they did not even call themselves BPM.  But now with the ARIS deal that is changing.  As far as my BPMS Reports on bpminstitute.org are concerned, the ground rules are 1)vendor is a sponsor of BPM Institute, and 2)vendor agrees to be reviewed and coorperates in the process.  I&#8217;m hoping to have them in for 2007 and I think you will see them showing up in the Gartner/Forrester reviews then too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: khookguy</title>
		<link>http://www.brsilver.com/wordpress/2006/06/29/gartner-bpms-quadrant-released/comment-page-1/#comment-274</link>
		<dc:creator>khookguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 13:24:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brsilver.com/wordpress/2006/06/29/gartner-bpms-quadrant-released/#comment-274</guid>
		<description>Why doesn't Oracle feature more prominently in Gartner or in your reviews?  I just did a search on Dice.com and &#62; 60% of the jobs related to BPEL are for the Oracle platform.

I don't work for Oracle.  I'm just curious, as I find that job postings on Dice are usually a good indicated of market leadership.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why doesn&#8217;t Oracle feature more prominently in Gartner or in your reviews?  I just did a search on Dice.com and &gt; 60% of the jobs related to BPEL are for the Oracle platform.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t work for Oracle.  I&#8217;m just curious, as I find that job postings on Dice are usually a good indicated of market leadership.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thought Leadership</title>
		<link>http://www.brsilver.com/wordpress/2006/06/29/gartner-bpms-quadrant-released/comment-page-1/#comment-186</link>
		<dc:creator>Thought Leadership</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2006 00:56:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brsilver.com/wordpress/2006/06/29/gartner-bpms-quadrant-released/#comment-186</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;So what do vendors think of industry analysts?...&lt;/strong&gt;

Ismael Ghalimi, CEO of Intalio makes some interesting statements in his blog regarding industry analysts...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>So what do vendors think of industry analysts?&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Ismael Ghalimi, CEO of Intalio makes some interesting statements in his blog regarding industry analysts&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thought Leadership</title>
		<link>http://www.brsilver.com/wordpress/2006/06/29/gartner-bpms-quadrant-released/comment-page-1/#comment-182</link>
		<dc:creator>Thought Leadership</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2006 12:13:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brsilver.com/wordpress/2006/06/29/gartner-bpms-quadrant-released/#comment-182</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Outstanding Questions for Industry Analyst Michael...&lt;/strong&gt;

Still struggling on some aspects of your response to one of my postings......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Outstanding Questions for Industry Analyst Michael&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Still struggling on some aspects of your response to one of my postings&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Intalio, Leader in Open Source BPMS &#187; Gartner BPMS Magic Quadrant</title>
		<link>http://www.brsilver.com/wordpress/2006/06/29/gartner-bpms-quadrant-released/comment-page-1/#comment-129</link>
		<dc:creator>Intalio, Leader in Open Source BPMS &#187; Gartner BPMS Magic Quadrant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2006 18:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brsilver.com/wordpress/2006/06/29/gartner-bpms-quadrant-released/#comment-129</guid>
		<description>[...] If you wonder why Intalio was not included, read comments to this blog post. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] If you wonder why Intalio was not included, read comments to this blog post. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Hamm</title>
		<link>http://www.brsilver.com/wordpress/2006/06/29/gartner-bpms-quadrant-released/comment-page-1/#comment-127</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Hamm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2006 15:21:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brsilver.com/wordpress/2006/06/29/gartner-bpms-quadrant-released/#comment-127</guid>
		<description>Bruce and Ismael,

Thank you for the thoughtful responses.

For my two cents Intalio is a well kept secret belonging in the visionaries quadrant  with hidden potential to vault into the leader's quadrant based on their OSS (open source software) strategy, product maturation pace, proven ability to select the right architectural trends/components/standards, and a long history of innovating/understanding the BPMS space that very few other vendor have demonstrated.

They have however lacked on the sales side in the past but again I think their OSS strategy will make-up for this and plays to their other strengths. By the time the bigger players figure it out Intalio could be well on their way to becoming the MySQL of BPMS.

Four critical milestone for Intalio: the completion of their CE Edition, inclusion in a certified OSS stack like SpikeSource or Redhat, riding the AJAX forms wave with support for Adobe/MM, and an articulate SOA ESB strategy. I think they will do it having met and observed their team over time. They have real talent and real focus. That said I am not an analyst just an interested IT consultant / ex-IT exec.

Mark</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bruce and Ismael,</p>
<p>Thank you for the thoughtful responses.</p>
<p>For my two cents Intalio is a well kept secret belonging in the visionaries quadrant  with hidden potential to vault into the leader&#8217;s quadrant based on their OSS (open source software) strategy, product maturation pace, proven ability to select the right architectural trends/components/standards, and a long history of innovating/understanding the BPMS space that very few other vendor have demonstrated.</p>
<p>They have however lacked on the sales side in the past but again I think their OSS strategy will make-up for this and plays to their other strengths. By the time the bigger players figure it out Intalio could be well on their way to becoming the MySQL of BPMS.</p>
<p>Four critical milestone for Intalio: the completion of their CE Edition, inclusion in a certified OSS stack like SpikeSource or Redhat, riding the AJAX forms wave with support for Adobe/MM, and an articulate SOA ESB strategy. I think they will do it having met and observed their team over time. They have real talent and real focus. That said I am not an analyst just an interested IT consultant / ex-IT exec.</p>
<p>Mark</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ghalimi</title>
		<link>http://www.brsilver.com/wordpress/2006/06/29/gartner-bpms-quadrant-released/comment-page-1/#comment-126</link>
		<dc:creator>ghalimi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2006 13:56:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brsilver.com/wordpress/2006/06/29/gartner-bpms-quadrant-released/#comment-126</guid>
		<description>Mark,

We did not make it because our revenues are less than $20M. According to such a criteria, a company like JBoss would not make it either. Go figure...

Yet, I tend to believe that Gartner is not really supportive of Open Source in general, for the following reason: Gartner makes about a $1B a year by selling advisory services to vendors and customers. If your product is Open Source, it's a lot easier for customers to try it by themselves in a real production environment, and decide whether or not it's going to match their requirements. No need to pay an analyst for that, at least not a traditional one.

Open Source analyst firms such as &lt;a href="http://www.redmonk.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;RedMonk&lt;/a&gt; have understood that very well. So my advice is the following. If you want Intalio to appear on Gartner's Magic Quadrant, ask them for it, especially if you're a Gartner customer. And if you want a better Magic Quadrant to be developed, team up with other customers that have direct experience with multiple BPM products, and ask the good folks at RedMonk to write about it. My guess is that you'd come up with a very different Magic Quadrant this way, but this one might be a lot more useful to customers.

Best regards
-Ismael</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark,</p>
<p>We did not make it because our revenues are less than $20M. According to such a criteria, a company like JBoss would not make it either. Go figure&#8230;</p>
<p>Yet, I tend to believe that Gartner is not really supportive of Open Source in general, for the following reason: Gartner makes about a $1B a year by selling advisory services to vendors and customers. If your product is Open Source, it&#8217;s a lot easier for customers to try it by themselves in a real production environment, and decide whether or not it&#8217;s going to match their requirements. No need to pay an analyst for that, at least not a traditional one.</p>
<p>Open Source analyst firms such as <a href="http://www.redmonk.com/" rel="nofollow">RedMonk</a> have understood that very well. So my advice is the following. If you want Intalio to appear on Gartner&#8217;s Magic Quadrant, ask them for it, especially if you&#8217;re a Gartner customer. And if you want a better Magic Quadrant to be developed, team up with other customers that have direct experience with multiple BPM products, and ask the good folks at RedMonk to write about it. My guess is that you&#8217;d come up with a very different Magic Quadrant this way, but this one might be a lot more useful to customers.</p>
<p>Best regards<br />
-Ismael</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bruce</title>
		<link>http://www.brsilver.com/wordpress/2006/06/29/gartner-bpms-quadrant-released/comment-page-1/#comment-123</link>
		<dc:creator>bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2006 19:33:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brsilver.com/wordpress/2006/06/29/gartner-bpms-quadrant-released/#comment-123</guid>
		<description>Intalio apparently didn't make the checklist hurdle (possbily the modeling/simulation requirement, BAM, etc), nor probably the revenue hurdle. You'd need to ask them. I'm not endorsing the Gartner methodology. It is what it is.   If it were "my" quadrant, they'd be in the visionary box.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Intalio apparently didn&#8217;t make the checklist hurdle (possbily the modeling/simulation requirement, BAM, etc), nor probably the revenue hurdle. You&#8217;d need to ask them. I&#8217;m not endorsing the Gartner methodology. It is what it is.   If it were &#8220;my&#8221; quadrant, they&#8217;d be in the visionary box.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Hamm</title>
		<link>http://www.brsilver.com/wordpress/2006/06/29/gartner-bpms-quadrant-released/comment-page-1/#comment-122</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Hamm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2006 19:28:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brsilver.com/wordpress/2006/06/29/gartner-bpms-quadrant-released/#comment-122</guid>
		<description>What happened to Intalio. Do they only evaluate propietary solutions?

Could comment on where oyu would place Intalio on the quadrant?

Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What happened to Intalio. Do they only evaluate propietary solutions?</p>
<p>Could comment on where oyu would place Intalio on the quadrant?</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
