Comments on: Another View on BPEL4People http://www.brsilver.com/wordpress/2006/06/20/another-view-on-bpel4people/ Bruce Silver's blog on business process management Sat, 27 Feb 2010 10:22:38 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 By: Gendal World http://www.brsilver.com/wordpress/2006/06/20/another-view-on-bpel4people/comment-page-1/#comment-120 Gendal World Fri, 23 Jun 2006 13:26:41 +0000 http://www.brsilver.com/wordpress/2006/06/20/another-view-on-bpel4people/#comment-120 <strong>What's the right way to include human tasks in a B...</strong> Bruce Silver points to my qualified defence of BPEL4People and asks what the best way to include human tasks in a BPEL process is.... What’s the right way to include human tasks in a B…

Bruce Silver points to my qualified defence of BPEL4People and asks what the best way to include human tasks in a BPEL process is….

]]> By: Loosely Coupled Thinking http://www.brsilver.com/wordpress/2006/06/20/another-view-on-bpel4people/comment-page-1/#comment-119 Loosely Coupled Thinking Fri, 23 Jun 2006 00:16:38 +0000 http://www.brsilver.com/wordpress/2006/06/20/another-view-on-bpel4people/#comment-119 <strong>BPM Think Tank Presentations Available...</strong> A recap of the BPM Think Tank conference was made available earlier this month.  ...... BPM Think Tank Presentations Available…

A recap of the BPM Think Tank conference was made available earlier this month.  ……

]]> By: Derek Miers http://www.brsilver.com/wordpress/2006/06/20/another-view-on-bpel4people/comment-page-1/#comment-118 Derek Miers Thu, 22 Jun 2006 10:08:48 +0000 http://www.brsilver.com/wordpress/2006/06/20/another-view-on-bpel4people/#comment-118 Sort of goes back to why standards in the first place. On a call the other day around this BP Runtime data thing I have been working on, one of the vendors on the call pointed to the need for vendors to avoid investing in the things that the market doesnt value. The problem as we both know is that "the market" is told what to "value" by the big name advisory firms (no name, no pack drill), who in turn are often influenced by the agenda's of the big name technology vendors. The reality is that most end-users who are asking for standards like BPEL (and even BPEL4People) have no idea how they would actually use these things in the real world. They just want to see it there. Sort of goes back to why standards in the first place. On a call the other day around this BP Runtime data thing I have been working on, one of the vendors on the call pointed to the need for vendors to avoid investing in the things that the market doesnt value.
The problem as we both know is that “the market” is told what to “value” by the big name advisory firms (no name, no pack drill), who in turn are often influenced by the agenda’s of the big name technology vendors.
The reality is that most end-users who are asking for standards like BPEL (and even BPEL4People) have no idea how they would actually use these things in the real world. They just want to see it there.

]]> By: Sandy Kemsley http://www.brsilver.com/wordpress/2006/06/20/another-view-on-bpel4people/comment-page-1/#comment-117 Sandy Kemsley Wed, 21 Jun 2006 14:40:17 +0000 http://www.brsilver.com/wordpress/2006/06/20/another-view-on-bpel4people/#comment-117 Seems to be a bit of interest in BPEL4People lately: Joe McKendrick <a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/service-oriented/?p=644" rel="nofollow">blogged about it a few days ago</a>, as I'm sure that you're aware since you were quoted, and David Ogren <a href="http://www.ebizq.net/blogs/bpmblog/2006/06/back_to_blogging.php" rel="nofollow">mentioned how a customer asked if they supported it yet</a>! Seems to be a bit of interest in BPEL4People lately: Joe McKendrick blogged about it a few days ago, as I’m sure that you’re aware since you were quoted, and David Ogren mentioned how a customer asked if they supported it yet!

]]>