Archive for May 24th, 2006

More on Think Tank

My previous post just hit the low points.  Sandy has a more complete writeup of the day’s activities, which is mostly accurate.  Kinda long, though, Sandy.  Didn’t have time to fin

1 comment May 24th, 2006

Nine Outrageous Things I Learned At Think Tank

  1. BPM is about empowering people.  It was co-opted by integration vendors, who took it down an IT-centric path.  – Connie Moore, Forrester.  [Note: Forrester has separate analysts and “waves” for human-centric and integration-centric BPM.  Guess which is Connie’s…]
  2. The ultimate goal of BPM is self-aware processes that can recommend changes to process owners.  – Connie again.  [Yeah, I hear businesses asking for that all the time.]
  3. Portability of process templates was never a goal of BPEL, just interoperability [i.e., abstract process definition].  – John Evdemon, Microsoft, BPEL TC co-chair.  [You mean I’ve been defending BPEL against the haters all this time for nothing??]
  4. BPEL is not ready for production. – Evdemon  [Because the 2.0 spec could still change in the next 30 days?  At least I hope that’s it…]
  5. BPEL probably got more press than it deserved when it came out because of the vendors supporting it.  I probably should be covering up my badge.  – Evdemon again  [At least the guy’s honest!  Note: BizTalk 06 still doesn't support it except as an import/export format.]
  6. OMG can’t finalize the metamodel (BPDM) and schema for BPMN until it works out the complete semantics of choreography (message exchange patterns between multiple collaborating processes).  – Fred Cummins, EDS, OMG BPDM TC.  [Translation: don’t hold your breath…]
  7. The BPDM metamodel and BPMN schema are available today.  It’s called XPDL.  – Keith Swenson, WfMC XPDL TC.  [That’s basically true.  OMG has effectively given XPDL a two-year window to establish itself as the de facto BPMN schema, and make the official OMG epic irrelevant.]
  8. An easier way to do BPM is to just use modeling and BAM, and forget the process engine and BPMS.  That would make it easier to “sell” internally.  - Consensus of BPM practitioners at my roundtable.  [D'oh!]
  9. My blog posts are too long.  Who has time to read 500 words?  - Sandy Kemsley, BPM blogger.  [I have no comeback to that one.]

6 comments May 24th, 2006


BPMN Training

BPMessentials
Learn BPMN the right way. Not just compliance with the spec, but maximum effectiveness as a common visual language. Methodology, patterns, best practices, organizing complex models... Hands-on with a tool. Loads of exercises, both inline and mail-in (with individualized help). Certification of proficiency.
Available online and in 2-day public classes. Don't be left behind.
Next classes San Francisco October 1-2, New York November 6-7

Content Requiring Login

Some reports on BPMS Watch are only available to logged-in users. This includes: LOG IN HERE
Registration is easy, and its free. Click here to register. If you are registered, you have access to the private pages.

Pages

Calendar

May 2006
M T W T F S S
« Apr   Jun »
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031  

Featured Advertiser

Recent Comments

Feeds

BPMS Watch Google Gadget

Add to Google

Blogroll