Archive for April, 2006

BPM’s Top-Down Path to SOA

I got a nice note yesterday from Paul Fisher, an IT exec at the FDA, on my BPM 2.0 manifesto.  He was struck, in particular, by the line that said:

“[BPM's] top-down design contrasts starkly with current SOA initiatives, which are bottom-up and IT-driven, and where the services exposed for composition are determined by IT’s notion of enterprise architecture, not by process-centric analysis.”

He goes on to say,

That’s exactly what is going on here, and I’m trying to argue with people who are trying to build services simply to be able to say look ma, SOA!

You can see the rest of his comment to the BPM 2.0 post here, but I’m trying to restart the discussion around BPM as a top-down approach to SOA.  Top-down as in goal-directed, the goal being optimization of business performance by improving a particular business process.  It’s the process owners on the business side that should decide which services get rolled out first, and BPM provides a methodology for doing that.  It’s the process, the service orchestration, that determines which services get built.

In contrast, it seems that a lot of SOA efforts today put too much emphasis on the A.  I can already see enterprise architects’ heads exploding: Business-directed implementation is not architecture, it’s spaghetti, yadda yadda.  Instead, we need to first build a comprehensive services layer, integrate it with our stack, etc.

But it doesn’t make sense to fully build out the infrastructure when the standards keep changing and the middleware doubles in richness every 6 months.   BPMS offers an alternative practical  approach that is more grounded in quickly deployable solutions with built-in performance metrics, including ROI.   That iterative approach is more likely to lead to an accepted enterprise service architecture than trying to fill out all the colored squares in the EA diagram up front and declaring, OK we’re SOA now!

Phil Gilbert makes a similar point:

SOA is a great step and is the foundation that insures [easier integration]… But business process management is NOT SOA! It’s not part of the “SOA stack.” Business process management is about the business…

In order to succeed, BPM has to convince IT that it provides a better path to SOA and implementation success, and has to convince the business side that there’s more to BPM than just modeling.

 

 

 

5 comments April 7th, 2006

Reader-Driven Research

I’m trying to get deeper into this blogging thing and looking for more interaction with readers, so here’s an experiment.  There’s a new poll widget on BPMS Watch that lets you tell me who which vendors and products you’d like to hear more about.  With so many vendors out there, your input will help shape the focus.  If the one you like isn’t on the list, check Other and say who in a Comment on this post.

1 comment April 6th, 2006

IBM Puts a Business Face on SOA

IBM today unleashed a tidal wave of product announcements under the heading “SOA from a Business Centric Perspective.”  Details on individual offerings are still sketchy.  This was mostly shock and awe:  Surrender Earthlings, our technology is simply too vast and powerful… 

And it really is an impressive array of stuff.  In addition to enhancements to WebSphere Business Modeler, Monitor, Process Server, and Integration Developer - all the components of the WebSphere BPM suite - IBM is throwing a bunch of new stuff into the mix.  Notable are the inclusion of DB2 Content Manager and Workplace technology.  I could never understand why IBM, which had decent workflow technology in its 1990s-era document management products, ever built this giant Chinese wall between BPM and Content Manager.  Maybe it was that branding thing - if products were in two different IBM “brands” they may as well have been from separate companies. 

But it looks like that wall has come down.  IBM is introducing a QuickStart Toolkit that integrates DB2 Content Manager with WebSphere BPM as a set of service components, and allows CM to act as a repository of Workplace Forms.  (Why not a repository of process models as well?)

The other significant piece of IBM-to-IBM integration is WebSphere Portal, which is not only being integrated with Process Server but appears to be going full-bore with Ajax, including a whole new Ajax Toolkit Framework, much of it open-source.  That should make all you Kool-Aid-drinking mashup-loving Web 2.0 geeks happy.  Throw in the Bowstreet portlet factory stuff and the Workplace Dashboard components (still not sure how these complement/compete with WebSphere Business Monitor), and you have the makings of a comprehensive BPMS steamroller.

The various offerings announced today will be released over the next 6 months.  More news on these when the “deep-dive” briefings begin.

2 comments April 3rd, 2006

Management Buyout at Global 360

Today Global 360 announced the completion of a $200 Million management buyout led by TA Associates, with participation by Technology Crossover Ventures and JMI Equity.  The buyout reaffirms the leadership of the current executive management team, led by Michael Crosno, and is intended to further the company’s long-term growth strategy.

Global 360 is an interesting organization, with technology that goes back to the earliest prehistory of BPM.  Under founder Sonny Oates, G360 - originally called eiStream - was successful at rolling up traditional workflow and imaging companies struggling to make the transition to what we now call BPM.  Two of the more important ones were Eastman Software (formerly Wang Software, which Joe Tucci sold to Eastman Kodak for $360 Million!) and the ViewStar product from Lucent (formerly Mosaix, who bought the original ViewStar company; in 1991 or so ViewStar was the first software company to call its product “business process automation.”)  A common thread linking these acquisitions was a large and stable installed base in the Fortune 1000, representing a healthy maintenance revenue stream.

For the first couple years, eiStream/G360 kind of hunkered down, cut costs, and used that maintenance stream to stablize their fleet of leaky vessels.  But then they started adding some interesting new components and began to hire generally-acknowledged BPM “smart guys” like Robert Shapiro of Cape Visions (one of the first modeling, simulation, and performance management tools integrated with workflow/BPM) and Jon Pyke (ex-CTO of Staffware, now dabbling in hosted BPM solutions). 

Robert led the way to extending XPDL (the “other” business process modeling language) to version 2.0, designed to serialize the full semantics of BPMN (we’re still waiting for BPMI/OMG to provide their own BPMN metamodel and schema).  He also developed a graphical BPMN modeling tool for G360 — including support for message links, intermediate events, and the other cool parts of BPMN that most BPMS vendors choose to leave out.  G360 also linked modeling and performance management with the introduction of Business Optimization Server and its focus on “goal-directed” process implementation.  And they introduced innovations like collaborative case folder management and integration of Microsoft SharePoint in a structured business process.

But the pieces seemed slow to come together in an end-to-end integrated BPMS.  When I covered G360 in my 2006 BPMS Report last November, the BPMN modeler was supposed to be a free download.  That hasn’t happened yet.  Also when you export the BPMN (or XPDL 2.0) to the G360 Designer, some of those cool BPMN constructs have no direct implementation in the Designer.  And, while brilliant as a marketing hook, G360’s “goal-directed” BPM still takes a fairly rudimentary approach to goals and optimization.

Bottom line, G360 has some really interesting parts that could be the foundation of a world class BPMS.  I’m hopeful that the buyout now gives management the cash and the go-ahead to make it happen.

 

 

1 comment April 3rd, 2006

Next Posts


BPMN Training

BPMessentials
Learn BPMN the right way. Not just compliance with the spec, but maximum effectiveness as a common visual language. Methodology, patterns, best practices, organizing complex models... Hands-on with a tool. Loads of exercises, both inline and mail-in (with individualized help). Certification of proficiency.
Available online and in 2-day public classes. Don't be left behind.
Next classes San Francisco October 1-2, New York November 6-7

Content Requiring Login

Some reports on BPMS Watch are only available to logged-in users. This includes: LOG IN HERE
Registration is easy, and its free. Click here to register. If you are registered, you have access to the private pages.

Pages

Calendar

April 2006
M T W T F S S
« Mar   May »
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930

Featured Advertiser

Recent Comments

Feeds

BPMS Watch Google Gadget

Add to Google

Blogroll