Doug Henschen, my editor at Intelligent Enterprise, already has posted an interview with Gartner’s BPM guru Jim Sinur, live from their shindig in Opryland. Jim makes some interesting points about the market, but the BPM bloggers on site (e.g. Kemsley, Taylor) seem to be most taken by Gartner’s new BPM “maturity model.” I’m sure it makes a great Powerpoint slide, but not sure I’m buyin’ it.
It starts off on the safe side: Most companies, he says, are at stage 1(modeling and measuring) or 2(tweaking and optimizing, using business rules). OK, I believe that. So what comes next? Stage 3 is an enterprise-wide process architecture with processes extended to trading partners. Stage 4 is instrumenting a framework of performance management goals against the actual process implementation.
The order seems funny to me. If that’s the way BPM is going to be adopted, it’s not how BPMS vendors have oriented their tools. Later in the interview, Jim talks about the business-driven iterative improvement strategy that is really driving BPM. But his maturity model is not iterative, it’s waterfall. A more logical progression would seem to be:
- Model and measure (as-is and simulated to-be), and establish performance targets.
- Implement one app, and measure performance achieved.
- Tweak and optimize, add business rules.
- Iterate that for a few more apps.
- Develop the enterprise process architecture.
The essence of modeling is performance prediction. When the modeling and simulation tool is part of a BPMS, there is an implicit assumption that the KPIs that were modeled will be monitored at runtime. That’s why the BPMS vendor has taken the trouble to include BAM in the offering. Maybe Jim is saying that’s what the vendors are selling but companies aren’t ready for it yet? I don’t know, but the thought of rolling out an enterprise process architecture before I had closed the loop on process performance doesn’t really make sense.
3 Responses to “BPM Immaturity Model Unveiled”
BPMN Training
NEW! Virtual classroom Jan 25-28. Find out more!
Learn BPMN the right way. Not just compliance with the spec, but maximum effectiveness as a common visual language. Methodology, patterns, best practices, organizing complex models.... Hands-on with a tool. Loads of exercises, both in class and post-class (with individualized help, certification of proficiency). 60-day license to Process Modeler for Visio included.
Available online and in 2-day public classes. Don't be left behind.
2010 public classes Online Jan 25-28, Chicago April 21-22, San Francisco June 30-July 1, DC September 15-16, New York November 3-4. Have 10 or more students? Private 2-day classes delivered at your site, with same tool and post-class certification. Contact me for pricing and details.
BPMN Method and Style
“Father of BPM 2.0″ starts BPMS Blog…
Bruce Silver, who coined the term BPM 2.0 some time ago, has been blogging on the topic at IT|Redux for some time. Bruce has started a new blog BPMS Watch yesterday with the post called “BPM Immaturity Model Unveiled”. Follow Bruce’…
Bruce, not sure if I agree with your interpretation of the BPM^3, although I had the benefit of seeing Sinur talk about it live at the Gartner BPM summit this week. If you consider my description, to which you’ve already linked, level 2 includes “some optimization…on the processes” which does imply that performance targets are being set and measured against. Only then do they move on to level 3 and spread process management across the enterprise. I see level 4 as integrating the process performance measurements that started in level 2 into a larger corporate performance management initiative, not the point at which measurement starts.
Sandy,
Fair enough. I was getting my synopsis from Doug Henschen’s interview with Jim, who was probably trying to remember what he originally said. Like that game of telephone, the signal to noise was probably too low by the time I got it. Your version makes more sense.
Now, how do I turn this stupid “comment moderation” thing OFF?