<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BPMN&#039;s Three Levels, Reconsidered</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.brsilver.com/2008/12/03/bpmns-three-levels-reconsidered/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.brsilver.com/2008/12/03/bpmns-three-levels-reconsidered/</link>
	<description>Bruce Silver on business process management</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 22:38:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce Silver on BPMN &#8212; SOA Talk</title>
		<link>http://www.brsilver.com/2008/12/03/bpmns-three-levels-reconsidered/comment-page-1/#comment-704</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce Silver on BPMN &#8212; SOA Talk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 19:54:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brsilver.com/?p=399br#comment-704</guid>
		<description>[...] Silver wrote about BPMN as ?the first serious attempt to provide a common visual language for process description shared [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Silver wrote about BPMN as ?the first serious attempt to provide a common visual language for process description shared [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Levels of process thinking - Process Is The Main Thing</title>
		<link>http://www.brsilver.com/2008/12/03/bpmns-three-levels-reconsidered/comment-page-1/#comment-703</link>
		<dc:creator>Levels of process thinking - Process Is The Main Thing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 18:45:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brsilver.com/?p=399br#comment-703</guid>
		<description>[...] Silver posted an article &#8220;BPMN?s Three Levels, Reconsidered&#8221; on his blog. (It&#8217;s a fllow-up to the earlier post on the matter: &#8220;Three Levels [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Silver posted an article &#8220;BPMN?s Three Levels, Reconsidered&#8221; on his blog. (It&#8217;s a fllow-up to the earlier post on the matter: &#8220;Three Levels [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: samarin</title>
		<link>http://www.brsilver.com/2008/12/03/bpmns-three-levels-reconsidered/comment-page-1/#comment-702</link>
		<dc:creator>samarin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 13:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brsilver.com/?p=399br#comment-702</guid>
		<description>Should we have a coherent set of commonly agreed and complimentary standards? Of course, such a set of standards MUST be architectured first.

For example, as W3C provide for HTML

- XHTML (structure and content)
- CSS (presentation)
- DOM-based API (dynamic modification)
- extra special formats (graphics, etc.)

Hopefully at one moment, vendors will compete in compliance and performance (as with ACID3 test for Web browsers).

Thanks,
AS</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Should we have a coherent set of commonly agreed and complimentary standards? Of course, such a set of standards MUST be architectured first.</p>
<p>For example, as W3C provide for HTML</p>
<p>- XHTML (structure and content)<br />
- CSS (presentation)<br />
- DOM-based API (dynamic modification)<br />
- extra special formats (graphics, etc.)</p>
<p>Hopefully at one moment, vendors will compete in compliance and performance (as with ACID3 test for Web browsers).</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
AS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

