<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lombardi Blueprint Eases the Path to BPM</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.brsilver.com/2007/02/12/lombardi-blueprint-eases-the-path-to-bpm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.brsilver.com/2007/02/12/lombardi-blueprint-eases-the-path-to-bpm/</link>
	<description>Bruce Silver on business process management</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 22:38:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: BPM as Service &#171; Every Thing 2.0</title>
		<link>http://www.brsilver.com/2007/02/12/lombardi-blueprint-eases-the-path-to-bpm/comment-page-1/#comment-376</link>
		<dc:creator>BPM as Service &#171; Every Thing 2.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2007 05:45:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brsilver.com/2007/02/12/lombardi-blueprint-eases-the-path-to-bpm/br#comment-376</guid>
		<description>[...] March 2nd, 2007   Last month, two BPM vendors announced BPM as Service offering. First, Lombardi announced its hosted modeling offering, Lombardi Blueprint, which Bruce Silver covered here. Then, Appian announced a hosted version of its product, which again Bruce covered here. While these initiatives towards BPM as a Service are both welcome and inevitable, I doubt the true value of either. In fact, I find myself agreeing with Ismael&#8217;s blog Who Needs BPM as a Service on multiple counts. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] March 2nd, 2007   Last month, two BPM vendors announced BPM as Service offering. First, Lombardi announced its hosted modeling offering, Lombardi Blueprint, which Bruce Silver covered here. Then, Appian announced a hosted version of its product, which again Bruce covered here. While these initiatives towards BPM as a Service are both welcome and inevitable, I doubt the true value of either. In fact, I find myself agreeing with Ismael&#8217;s blog Who Needs BPM as a Service on multiple counts. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

