<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Business Value of BPMS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.brsilver.com/2006/05/26/the-business-value-of-bpms/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.brsilver.com/2006/05/26/the-business-value-of-bpms/</link>
	<description>Bruce Silver on business process management</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 22:38:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: davrud</title>
		<link>http://www.brsilver.com/2006/05/26/the-business-value-of-bpms/comment-page-1/#comment-93</link>
		<dc:creator>davrud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2006 01:54:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brsilver.com/2006/05/26/the-business-value-of-bpms/br#comment-93</guid>
		<description>jdavidson, I am not surprised at your confusion.  Enterprise Software companies have a habit of being so excited with their technology, features, and new 3-letter acronyms that they often fail the very people they are trying to help.  There is a disconnect between the technology developers and the users of the technology.  If you are interested in learning about these solutions, you might want to contact a few vendors and ask for case studies and even the opportunity to talk with a few customers.  Sometimes they can also provide a customer &quot;walk-through&quot; or an in-context scenario-based demonstration that highlights the value of the solution, versus the typical &quot;feature/function, let me show you how cool this is...&quot; style.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jdavidson, I am not surprised at your confusion.  Enterprise Software companies have a habit of being so excited with their technology, features, and new 3-letter acronyms that they often fail the very people they are trying to help.  There is a disconnect between the technology developers and the users of the technology.  If you are interested in learning about these solutions, you might want to contact a few vendors and ask for case studies and even the opportunity to talk with a few customers.  Sometimes they can also provide a customer &#8220;walk-through&#8221; or an in-context scenario-based demonstration that highlights the value of the solution, versus the typical &#8220;feature/function, let me show you how cool this is&#8230;&#8221; style.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jonas</title>
		<link>http://www.brsilver.com/2006/05/26/the-business-value-of-bpms/comment-page-1/#comment-92</link>
		<dc:creator>jonas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 May 2006 09:16:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brsilver.com/2006/05/26/the-business-value-of-bpms/br#comment-92</guid>
		<description>I would say that this is not just a question about using BPM, but to use the right tools and languages for each situation.

The technology platform (Java, .NET) is abstracted away behind the inter-connectivity of WS-* and SOA.

The new domain specific tools and languages should be able to &lt;strong&gt;run&lt;/strong&gt;, not just represented in models. I think what&#039;s important is to discuss is why models must be replaced with new languages.

Business Analysts is one important group these new languages should attract.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would say that this is not just a question about using BPM, but to use the right tools and languages for each situation.</p>
<p>The technology platform (Java, .NET) is abstracted away behind the inter-connectivity of WS-* and SOA.</p>
<p>The new domain specific tools and languages should be able to <strong>run</strong>, not just represented in models. I think what&#8217;s important is to discuss is why models must be replaced with new languages.</p>
<p>Business Analysts is one important group these new languages should attract.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jdavidson</title>
		<link>http://www.brsilver.com/2006/05/26/the-business-value-of-bpms/comment-page-1/#comment-91</link>
		<dc:creator>jdavidson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 May 2006 00:17:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brsilver.com/2006/05/26/the-business-value-of-bpms/br#comment-91</guid>
		<description>I am so glad to read this post because you just described my problem. I don&#039;t get it. Honestly.

I&#039;ve been reading here (and elsewhere) about BPMS and BPM and SOA and...  In the end, I cannot quite get what you&#039;re talking about. I am a really good Business Analyst. I think I could be good doing some of the things y&#039;all discuss. But so far I just don&#039;t get it.

Maybe I need to see it working, try it out, find a coach, something, because based on what I&#039;ve read so far the message is just a jumble to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am so glad to read this post because you just described my problem. I don&#8217;t get it. Honestly.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been reading here (and elsewhere) about BPMS and BPM and SOA and&#8230;  In the end, I cannot quite get what you&#8217;re talking about. I am a really good Business Analyst. I think I could be good doing some of the things y&#8217;all discuss. But so far I just don&#8217;t get it.</p>
<p>Maybe I need to see it working, try it out, find a coach, something, because based on what I&#8217;ve read so far the message is just a jumble to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

